The Applicant challenges the decision not to renew her term appointment, the decision of the Ethics and Business Conduct Department (EBC) to close its preliminary inquiry, and the alleged failure of the IFC to comply with the recommendations of the Performance Management Review (PMR) process. The IFC shall pay the Applicant three months’ net salary based on the last regular salary drawn by the Applicant; (2) The IFC shall contribute to the Applicant’s legal fees and costs in the amount of $5,000.00; and (3) All other claims are dismissed.

The Applicant challenges the Bank’s “denial of coverage for medical treatment obtained by [the Applicant] from October 5, 2020 to the present, and the Administrative Review Panel decision of March 23, 2023.” The Application is dismissed.

The Applicant claims that the Bank failed to take appropriate action consistent with its duty of care in response to the Applicant’s worsening medical condition. The Application is dismissed.

The Applicant challenges the Bank’s decisions (i) not to select him for a position during a batch rotation exercise and (ii) not to extend his term appointment. The Bank shall pay the Applicant twenty-one months’ net salary based on the last salary drawn by the Applicant, for the improper non-extension decision;(2) The Bank shall contribute to the Applicant’s legal fees and costs in the amount of $37,000.00; and (3) All other claims are dismissed.

The Applicant, in connection with her non-selection for a Human Resources (HR) Analyst position (Requisition No. 17459) at the IFC, challenges (i) the IFC’s application of the HR Analyst Tests Administration Policy (HATA Policy) on the grounds that it was applied retroactively, and (ii) the exemption of candidates from taking the HR Analyst test on the grounds that the exemption lacked any fixed procedure, objective criteria, or records for determining which candidates to exempt. The Application is dismissed.

The Applicant challenges the “determination communicated to him in his February 28, 2022, Letter of Appointment that he is ineligible for a Mobility Premium notwithstanding his eligibility under the applicable Staff Rule.” The Bank shall pay the Applicant the sum of the Mobility Premium benefit he would have received from 1 March 2022 to 22 December 2022; (2) The Bank shall pay the Applicant’s legal fees and costs in the amount of $15,770.00; and (3) All other claims are dismissed.

The Applicant challenges the Bank’s decision not to extend his term appointment. The Application is dismissed.

The Application is dismissed.

The Applicants challenge the decision communicated to [the] Applicants and other United Kingdom nationals by [the] Manager, Treasury Client Solutions, IFC, on February 7, 2022, stating that “after extensive consultations with relevant units across the WBG [World Bank Group], including the IBRD [International Bank for Reconstruction and Development] compensation unit, Legal, Tax office, and others,” “all UK nationals and UK permanent resident staff are liable for their share of the NIC [National Insurance Contribution] and reimbursement on past and current NIC obligations is not possible.” The Applications are dismissed. 

The Applicant challenges the decision not to renew her term appointment. The Bank shall pay the Applicant compensation in the amount of two years’ net salary based on the last regular salary drawn by the Applicant, for the improper non-renewal decision and its implication on her pension benefits; (2) The Bank shall pay the Applicant six months’ net salary based on the last regular salary drawn by the Applicant, for the Bank’s failure to act with fairness and transparency; (3) The Bank shall pay the Applicant six months’ net salary based on the last regular salary drawn by the Applicant, for the harm to the Applicant’s career prospects, reputation, and professional life; (4) The Bank shall pay the Applicant’s legal fees and costs in the amount of $30,510.00; and (5) All other claims are dismissed.

The Applicant challenges the determination made by the Human Resources Department Vice President (HRDVP) that she committed misconduct and the disciplinary measures imposed therein. With effect from the date of this judgment, the Applicant shall be reinstated as a staff member of the Bank; (2) The Bank may impose any disciplinary measure, or a combination of disciplinary measures, contained in Staff Rule 3.00, paragraph 10.06, short of termination; (3) The Bank shall contribute to the Applicant’s legal fees and costs in the amount of $30,000.00; and (4) All other claims are dismissed.

The Applicant alleges unfair treatment and violations of due process by the Ethics and Business Conduct Department (EBC). The Application is dismissed.

The Applicant alleges unfair treatment and violations of due process by the Ethics and Business Conduct Department (EBC). The Application is dismissed.

The Applicant challenges the decision not to renew her term appointment. The Bank shall pay the Applicant compensation in the amount of nine months’ net salary based on the last regular salary drawn by the Applicant for the improper non-renewal decision; (2) The Bank shall pay the Applicant six months’ net salary based on the last regular salary drawn by the Applicant for violations of due process; (3) The Bank shall pay the Applicant’s legal fees and costs in the amount of $19,900.00; and (4) All other claims are dismissed.

The Applicant challenges the determination that he was ineligible for an IFC Departmental Performance Award. The IFC shall pay the Applicant $4,624.00 for the loss of opportunity to be considered for a Departmental Performance Award in Fiscal Year 2021; (2) The IFC shall pay the Applicant $4,674.78 for the loss of opportunity to be considered for a Departmental Performance Award in Fiscal Year 2022; (3) The IFC shall include a copy of this judgment in the Applicant’s personnel file; (4) The IFC shall pay the Applicant’s legal fees and costs in the amount of $18,520.00; and (5)    All other claims are dismissed.

The Applicant challenges the 22 August 2022 decision of the Administrative Review Panel (ARP) denying his claim for Long-Term Disability (LTD) benefits. The Bank was ordered to pay the Applicant compensation in the amount of $10,000.00 and all other claims were dismissed.

The Applicant challenged the 29 November 2021 determination that he was ineligible for an IFC Departmental Performance Award based on 2019 disciplinary sanctions which included ineligibility for salary increases for a period of five years. The IFC submitted preliminary objections to the Tribunal’s jurisdiction. The IFC’s preliminary objections were dismissed; the IFC was ordered to contribute to the Applicant’s legal fees and costs in the amount of $5,000.00 for the preliminary objection phase of the proceedings.

The Applicant alleged unfair treatment and violations of due process by the Ethics and Business Conduct Department. Some of the Applicant’s requested remedies included a promotion to Grade Level GD and for her term contract to be converted to open-ended. The Bank averred that the Application should be dismissed because (i) it failed to identify any specific non-observance of the Applicant’s contract of employment or terms of appointment; (ii) the corrected Application was not filed in a timely manner; and (iii) the Applicant failed to exhaust internal remedies. The Bank’s preliminary objections with respect to claims pertaining to promotion and contract type were upheld; all other preliminary objections were dismissed; and the Bank was ordered to contribute to the Applicant’s legal fees and costs.

The Applicant alleged unfair treatment and violations of due process by the Ethics and Business Conduct Department. The Bank averred that the Application should be dismissed because (i) it failed to identify any specific non-observance of the Applicant’s contract of employment or terms of appointment and (ii) the corrected Application was not filed in a timely manner. The Bank’s preliminary objections were dismissed, and the Bank was ordered to contribute to the Applicant’s legal fees and costs.

The Applicant challenged the non-confirmation of her appointment. The Application was dismissed.