The Applicant seeks compensation for a flawed and improper investigation of charges of misconduct by the Bank’s Department of Institutional Integrity (“INT”) which ultimately exonerated him.
Search
AI v. IBRD
Number: 402Date:
Judgment/OrderDescription
The Applicant challenges the Bank’s decision not to assign him the function or title of the Global Manager of the International Comparison Program (“ICP”).
BB v. IBRD
Number: 426Date:
Judgment/OrderDescription
The Applicant contests the decision of the Vice President, Human Resources (“HRSVP”), to deny her request for compensation for a flawed and improper investigation of charges of misconduct by the Bank’s Department of Institutional Integrity (“INT”) which ultimately concluded that no misconduct had occurred.
Lansky (No. 1 and No. 2) v. IFC and IBRD
Number: 425Date:
Judgment/OrderDescription
The Applicant alleges harassment by the Worker’s Compensation Administrator and requests that the Bank and the Worker’s Compensation Administrator be ordered to cease and desist from such harassment which interferes with her treatment and that the Bank had breached the terms of the confidential MOU by attaching it to its Preliminary Objection in previous proceedings.
Aleem and Aleem v. IBRD
Number: 424Date:
Judgment/OrderDescription
Ms. Aleem initially asked the Bank to give effect to a Maryland divorce decree directing Mr. Aleem to pay half of his Bank pension to her. Mr. Aleem objected, stating that the Bank should give effect to a Pakistani divorce decree under which his former spouse was not entitled to any portion of his pension. The Bank’s Pension Benefits Administration Committee (“PBAC”) decided to suspend payments of the disputed portion of the pension until the matter was resolved by mutual agreement or by the Tribunal.
BA v. IBRD
Number: 423Date:
Judgment/OrderDescription
The Applicant is one of sixteen current and former staff members working in the Bank’s Department of Institutional Integrity (“INT”) contesting decisions taken by the Bank in August 2008 not to award the entire relief, in particular monetary compensation, recommended by an INT Staff Grievance Review Panel (“Grievance Panel”).
AZ v. IBRD
Number: 422Date:
Judgment/OrderDescription
The Applicant is one of sixteen current and former staff members working in the Bank’s Department of Institutional Integrity (“INT”) contesting decisions taken by the Bank in August 2008 not to award the entire relief, in particular monetary compensation, recommended by an INT Staff Grievance Review Panel (“Grievance Panel”).
AX v. IBRD
Number: 421Date:
Judgment/OrderDescription
The Applicant is one of sixteen current and former staff members working in the Bank’s Department of Institutional Integrity (“INT”) contesting decisions taken by the Bank in August 2008 not to award the entire relief, in particular monetary compensation, recommended by an INT Staff Grievance Review Panel (“Grievance Panel”).
AW v. IBRD
Number: 420Date:
Judgment/OrderDescription
The Applicant is one of sixteen current and former staff members working in the Bank’s Department of Institutional Integrity (“INT”) contesting decisions taken by the Bank in August 2008 not to award the entire relief, in particular monetary compensation, recommended by an INT Staff Grievance Review Panel (“Grievance Panel”).
AV v. IBRD
Number: 419Date:
Judgment/OrderDescription
The Applicant is one of sixteen current and former staff members working in the Bank’s Department of Institutional Integrity (“INT”) contesting decisions taken by the Bank in August 2008 not to award the entire relief, in particular monetary compensation, recommended by an INT Staff Grievance Review Panel (“Grievance Panel”).
AU v. IBRD
Number: 418Date:
Judgment/OrderDescription
The Applicant is one of sixteen current and former staff members working in the Bank’s Department of Institutional Integrity (“INT”) contesting decisions taken by the Bank in August 2008 not to award the entire relief, in particular monetary compensation, recommended by an INT Staff Grievance Review Panel (“Grievance Panel”).
AT v. IBRD
Number: 417Date:
Judgment/OrderDescription
The Applicant is one of sixteen current and former staff members working in the Bank’s Department of Institutional Integrity (“INT”) contesting decisions taken by the Bank in August 2008 not to award the entire relief, in particular monetary compensation, recommended by an INT Staff Grievance Review Panel (“Grievance Panel”).
AS v. IBRD
Number: 416Date:
Judgment/OrderDescription
The Applicant is one of sixteen current and former staff members working in the Bank’s Department of Institutional Integrity (“INT”) contesting decisions taken by the Bank in August 2008 not to award the entire relief, in particular monetary compensation, recommended by an INT Staff Grievance Review Panel (“Grievance Panel”).
AR v. IBRD
Number: 415Date:
Judgment/OrderDescription
The Applicant is one of sixteen current and former staff members working in the Bank’s Department of Institutional Integrity (“INT”) contesting decisions taken by the Bank in August 2008 not to award the entire relief, in particular monetary compensation, recommended by an INT Staff Grievance Review Panel (“Grievance Panel”).
AP v. IBRD
Number: 414Date:
Judgment/OrderDescription
The Applicant is one of sixteen current and former staff members working in the Bank’s Department of Institutional Integrity (“INT”) contesting decisions taken by the Bank in August 2008 not to award the entire relief, in particular monetary compensation, recommended by an INT Staff Grievance Review Panel (“Grievance Panel”).
AO v. IBRD
Number: 413Date:
Judgment/OrderDescription
The Applicant is one of sixteen current and former staff members working in the Bank’s Department of Institutional Integrity (“INT”) contesting decisions taken by the Bank in August 2008 not to award the entire relief, in particular monetary compensation, recommended by an INT Staff Grievance Review Panel (“Grievance Panel”).
AQ v. IBRD
Number: 412Date:
Judgment/OrderDescription
The Applicant is one of sixteen current and former staff members working in the Bank’s Department of Institutional Integrity (“INT”) contesting decisions taken by the Bank in August 2008 not to award the entire relief, in particular monetary compensation, recommended by an INT Staff Grievance Review Panel (“Grievance Panel”).
AN v. IBRD
Number: 411Date:
Judgment/OrderDescription
The Applicant is one of sixteen current and former staff members working in the Bank’s Department of Institutional Integrity (“INT”) contesting decisions taken by the Bank in August 2008 not to award the entire relief, in particular monetary compensation, recommended by an INT Staff Grievance Review Panel (“Grievance Panel”).
AM v. IBRD
Number: 410Date:
Judgment/OrderDescription
The Applicant is one of sixteen current and former staff members working in the Bank’s Department of Institutional Integrity (“INT”) contesting decisions taken by the Bank in August 2008 not to award the entire relief, in particular monetary compensation, recommended by an INT Staff Grievance Review Panel (“Grievance Panel”).
AL v. IBRD
Number: 409Date:
Judgment/OrderDescription
The Applicant is one of sixteen current and former staff members working in the Bank’s Department of Institutional Integrity (“INT”) contesting decisions taken by the Bank in August 2008 not to award the entire relief, in particular monetary compensation, recommended by an INT Staff Grievance Review Panel (“Grievance Panel”).