The Applicant challenges the 16 June 2015 decision of the Vice President of Human Resources (HRVP) following an investigation by the Office of Ethics and Business Conduct (EBC).

The Applicant contests the Human Resources Vice President’s (HRVP) finding that he committed misconduct, and opposes the disciplinary measures imposed by the HRVP.

The Applicant challenges inter alia the Bank’s decision to impose disciplinary measures against him.

The Applicant challenges inter alia the 23 August 2015 decision of the IFC not to renew or extend his appointment.

The Applicant is challenging the denial of the World Bank Group’s Claim Administrator of her claim to Workers’ Compensation and the decision of the IFC to uphold that denial.

The Applicant challenges: (i) her 2014 Performance Evaluation Plan (PEP) assessment; (ii) her Salary Review Increase (SRI) rating; and (iii) her placement on an Opportunity to Improve (OTI) plan.

The Applicant contests his supervisor’s decision not to renew his contract following the end of his three-year Term appointment

The Applicant challenges the non-renewal of his contract; alleged discrimination; the Bank’s alleged failure to provide the honest rationale behind the non-renewal of his contract; and the Bank’s alleged failure to provide clear guidance relating to his separation options upon the expiration of his contract.

The Tribunal concludes that there is no basis for a revision of DH because the Applicant failed to satisfy the conditions in Article XIII(1) of its Statute. 

The Applicant states that she challenges the following decisions: (i) the decision by the Office of Ethics and Business Conduct (EBC) not to reinvestigate her allegations; (ii) her nonselection for the Senior Knowledge Management Officer position; (iii) the Peer Review Services (PRS) Chair’s decision to dismiss some of her claims in Request for Review No. 195; (iv) the nonextension of her contract; (v) the failure of management to provide her interim protection; (vi) false revision of her personnel records and People Page profile on the Bank’s intranet; and (vii) the termination of her contract. In addition, she alleges certain procedural violations committed by EBC in its investigation of her allegations and by PRS in her Requests for Review.

The Applicant contests the following alleged decisions: (i) the non-renewal of his contract; (ii) the “[u]nauthorized disclosure of confidential personal information” about him; (iii) harassment and discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation; (iv) retaliation; (v) failure of senior management, Human Resources, and the Office of Ethics and Business Conduct (EBC) to protect him from discrimination and retaliation; (vi) unlawful manipulation of his email account after the termination of his contract; and (vii) non-selection for the Insurance Officer position.

The Applicant alleges the following: (i) the termination of his appointment was due to age discrimination; (ii) he was not given adequate notice of termination by the IFC; (iii) he was not given adequate notice of his performance deficiencies; (iv) he was not offered substitute work by the IFC; and (v) the IFC’s actions defamed him

The Applicant raised the following claims: (i) breach of a confidentiality provision in a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) of 1 April 2014 between the Applicant and the IFC; (ii) invalidity of the MOU on the grounds of duress and coercion exerted by the IFC; and (iii) wrongful termination of his contract.

The Applicant contests the decision of the South Asia Region Vice President to declare her employment redundant and terminate her employment contract.

The Applicant challenges the Bank’s 18 November 2013 decision to terminate his Short Term Consultancy (STC) contract.

The Applicant is challenging her 2013 Overall Performance Evaluation (OPE); her 2013 Salary Review Increase (SRI); and the termination of her employment through her placement on Long-Term Disability (LTD). The Bank filed a Preliminary Objection on 14 May 2015 regarding some of the Applicant’s claims.

The Applicant sought: a) rescission of his 2013 Overall Performance Evaluation (OPE) and Salary Review Increase (SRI) – or, in the alternative, referral back to Peer Review Services (PRS) ordering the reinstatement and continuation of PRS Request for Review No. 186; b) rescission of the Opportunity to Improve Plan (OTI) – or, in the alternative, referral back to PRS ordering the reinstatement and continuation of PRS Request for Review No. 186; c) removal of all records of his 2013 OPE and SRI and of the OTI from his personnel records – or, in the alternative, referral back to PRS ordering the reinstatement and continuation of PRS Request for Review No. 186; d) provision of full information as to the amount of all separation benefits which would be due to the Applicant if he were to resign from the World Bank as of 1 July 2015; e) invalidation of the MOU dated 3 September 2014, and the consequent reinstatement of his right to appeal the notice of his termination given to him on 14 July 2014; and f) appointment to a position within the World Bank equivalent to his former position of Program Officer, Level GF,

The Applicant challenges a number of decisions of the IFC relating to the January 2010 cancellation of his G4 visa and various legal fees he incurred as a result, including his subsequent placement on a Short-Term Assignment (STA). He also claims separation payments allegedly due to him when his employment with the IFC ended in January 2013.

The Applicant is mainly challenging: (i) her 2013 Overall Performance Evaluation (OPE) and Salary Review Increase (SRI); (ii) the validity of the Institutional Staff Resources Program (ISRP) agreement under which the Applicant would retire on 16 January 2015; (iii) the Bank’s alleged breach of the ISRP agreement; and (iv) the termination of her employment despite her placement on Short Term Disability (STD) status

Withdrawal.